Syntactic Ambiguity: Meter, Rhyme and Lineation Effects

06 November 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Although various factors have been considered in syntactic ambiguity research, the influence of formal textual features remains largely unexplored. Poem stimuli were designed to test whether line breaks influence the availability of preceding hosts for RC adjunction. In an online pilot reading study, we considered presentation in 5-line poem format (RC in its own verse) and in prose (RC and hosts on a single line). The prosodic features of rhyme and meter were manipulated to test whether they influence attachment decisions (by making a host more prominent) as well as whether they facilitate or impede the disambiguation process. Results: High Attachment was preferred the most while Low Attachment the least across all +/-Meter & Rhyme conditions. Stimuli were read significantly faster in their +Meter/+Rhyme version relative to the -Meter/-Rhyme condition. The combination of both these rhetorical devices led to processing delay, albeit not significant, when answering an attachment site question.

Keywords

Syntactic ambiguity
relative clause
Meter
Rhyme
Line break
Poetry reading
disambiguation
Prosodic boundary
Poem

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.