How to Submit
Browse
Events
Communities
About

Neuroimaging does not support the representational nature of the earliest human engravings: comment on Mellet et al.(2019)

09 December 2020, Version 1
Working Paper
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper provides a commentary on an article by Mellet et al (2019), which points out a number of inaccuracies and misinterpretations of neuroscientific data regarding the significance of the earliest engravings in the archaeological record.

Keywords

Earliest Engravings
Neuroimaging
Visual Word Form Area
Visual Cortex

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.

Version History

Dec 09, 2020 Version 1

Metrics

565
186
0
Views
Downloads
Citations

License

CC logo
CC
BY logo
BY
The content is available under CC BY 4.0 [opens in a new tab]

DOI

10.33774/coe-2020-0rfg8
D O I: 10.33774/coe-2020-0rfg8 [opens in a new tab]

Author’s competing interest statement

The author(s) have declared they have no conflict of interest with regard to this content

Ethics

The author(s) have declared ethics committee/IRB approval is not relevant to this content

Share