Do different languages train our brain in different ways? The discussion of typological distance and its influence in the bilingual brain

09 November 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

As we come to understand that a unified cognitive outcome of bilingualism is unlikely, attention is now more often directed to the factors that may leave an impact on the bilingual brain. One element that has started to receive attention is that of L1-L2 typological distance. In this presentation, I make the case that the scientific foundations to develop this line of inquiry are still not firm. I begin by arguing that the concept of ‘typological distance’ is overly generic and not firmly concretised in the realm of bilingualism research. Furthermore, discussions on how bilingual cognitive demands are formed as a result of L1-L2 typological distance, along with how such demands are connected to the aspect of skill, are fundamental yet underpowered. Finally, the significance of bilingual neural activity and neurostructural changes has yet to be concretised before conclusions on the influence of typological distance can be formed.

Keywords

Bilingualism
Cognitive demand
Typological Distance

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.