How to Submit
Browse
Events
Communities
About

PACT Tropical Moist Forest Accreditation Methodology v2.0

18 December 2023, Version 5
Working Paper
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This draft document describes the methodology developed by the Cambridge Center for Carbon Credits (4C) for estimating the number of credits to be issued to a project in the tropical moist forest (TMF) biome. It expands on the methodology outlined in (Swinfield and Balmford, 2023). We welcome comments and suggestions in the associated online document at https://tinyurl.com/cowgreport.

Keywords

Carbon credits
Methodology
Cambridge Center for Carbon Credits
Version 2.0

Supplementary weblinks

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Link to source code
Description
This is the link to the source code for a full implementation of the methodology described in Version 2.0 of the PACT TMF Avoided Deforestation document.
Actions
View

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.

Version History

Dec 18, 2023 Version 5

Version Notes

Added link to source code.

Metrics

1,676
903
0
Views
Downloads
Citations

License

CC logo
CC
BY logo
BY
The content is available under CC BY 4.0 [opens in a new tab]

DOI

10.33774/coe-2023-g584d-v5
D O I: 10.33774/coe-2023-g584d-v5 [opens in a new tab]

Funding

Tezos Foundation

Author’s competing interest statement

The author(s) have declared they have no conflict of interest with regard to this content

Ethics

The author(s) have declared ethics committee/IRB approval is not relevant to this content

Share