We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. Learn more about our Privacy Notice... [opens in a new tab]
This community is part of Research Directions - a journal collection based around cutting edge research questions.

Structural brain differences in individuals with insomnia compared to good sleepers for volume, thickness, and shape

03 June 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.
This item is a response to a research question in Sleep Psychology
Q. What factors influence individual differences in vulnerability/resilience to sleep loss and/or circadian misalignment?

Abstract

At its core, insomnia is the inability to sleep when expecting to do so. The behavioral and cognitive factors associated with insomnia have been extensively studied but the pathophysiology of insomnia remains unclear. This study investigated structural brain differences in a well-characterized sample of individuals who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for insomnia disorder (n = 58) and controls (n = 67) using high-dimensional surface-based mapping procedures. MRI scans were collected at the University of Pittsburgh at either 1.5 or 3 Tesla. We harmonized these scans using neuroComBat procedures. Image processing included the FreeSurfer toolkit and large-deformation diffeo-morphic metric mapping (LDDMM). We hypothesized that the insomnia group would demonstrate altered volume, cortical thickness, and shape relative to a control group in regions predicted by prior genetic analyses and MRI studies: orbitofrontal cortex, prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, precuneus, hippocampus, thalamus, cingulate, caudate nucleus, and cerebellum. Repeated measures general linear models were conducted for extracted values of all regions, with group status as the between-subjects effect and hemisphere as the within-subjects effect. We found that compared to controls, individuals with insomnia had significantly greater cerebellar gray matter volume than controls with a rightward volumetric asymmetry, thinner anterior cingulate cortices, inward deformations in the head of the right caudate, and outward deformation in the right CA1 region of the hippocampus. Structural differences may represent individual differences that confer vulnerability to insomnia. Alternatively, insomnia may result in brain alterations through regional sleep disruption or chronic daytime use differences.

Keywords

Insomnia
Neuroimaging
Pathophysiology
Cortical Thickness
Shape Deformation
Brain Volume

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.