![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png){kind=logo}
Abstract
The author of this article disproves the Euler product equal to the Riemann zeta function that the earlier mathematicians proved, and also provides the main reason why the Euler product is not equal to the Riemann zeta function.
Disproving the Euler Product equal to the Riemann Zeta Function
08 August 2024, Version 1
Working Paper
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.
Comments
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed
by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our
Commenting and Discussion Policy
[opens in a new tab]
- please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for
scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can
find more information about how to use the commenting feature here
[opens in a new tab]
.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
[opens in a new tab]
and
Terms of Service
[opens in a new tab]
apply.
Comment number 1, Chinnaraji Annamalai: Aug 12, 2024, 07:59
Chinnaraji Annamalai
Aug 12, 2024, 07:59
1
Under the subdivision "4. The Main Reason why the Euler Product is not equal to the Riemann Zeta Function": 1 to the power of any number is 1. For comparison on s =2, we must do the following without loss of generality: 1 to ∞ {(∑xi)-1} < {(∑yi)-1}.
Version History
Aug 08, 2024 Version 1
Metrics
84
29
0
Views
Downloads
Citations
Author’s competing interest statement
The author(s) have declared they have no conflict of interest with regard
to this content
Ethics
The author(s) have declared ethics committee/IRB approval is not relevant
to this content