HOMO SCIENCE

14 November 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This book is about science, system and scientific bureaucracy, scientific policy, culture, psychology, and other things from the perspective of epistemology (the science of science). It discusses the issues of the science of science and the main problems of the Kazakhstani scientific system as resistant factors of science management and scientific policy. A series of new epistemological paradigms and definitions are introduced (new Kazakhstani recursive index of scientific citation, level of scientific readiness, new convergent classification of sciences, and others). A series of new epistemological terms and definitions are introduced (arsocenosis, arsonomy, and others). The monograph is created within the framework of the development of the philosophy of science according to the classifier of scientific directions: 60000 (Humanities and Arts, 60300 (philosophy, ethics, and religion) 60303 "History and Philosophy of Science." And as a justification for the need for the development of Kazakhstani epistemology and gnoseology for optimal science management and correct scientific policy. Most of the monograph is written in a popular science genre. Understandable to everyone who is engaged in or interested in science.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.