Incidental learning of phonetically (un)motivated tone sandhi patterns by tonal and non-tonal L1 speakers

12 November 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This study examines how native Cantonese and English speakers acquire novel tone sandhi rules (i.e., contextually dependent tonal-phonological alternations) after incidental exposure, focusing on three aspects: the impact of prior tonal knowledge, learners’ post-exposure awareness, and the effects of phonetic motivation. We hypothesized that (1) native Cantonese speakers would outperform native English speakers, (2) learners could gain implicit knowledge after exposure, and (3) phonetically motivated tone sandhi rules would be easier to learn than unmotivated ones. To test these hypotheses, native Cantonese and native English speakers were incidentally exposed to pseudo-words featuring the Third-Tone and Half-Third sandhi in a Mandarin dialect. Following exposure, participants were asked to identify the more likely correct pronunciation between tonally licit and illicit options. Structural knowledge attribution was used to assess their awareness. Both tonal and non-tonal L1 speakers acquired tone sandhi knowledge, with the former outperforming the latter, supporting hypothesis (1). Participants gained both implicit and explicit knowledge, partially supporting hypothesis (2). However, phonetic motivation did not significantly affect the learnability of tone sandhi, challenging hypothesis (3). This study is seminal in showing that adults without a tonal L1 can incidentally learn disyllabic tonal-phonological rules, also challenging the notion of substantive bias in L2 phonological learning.

Keywords

incidental learning
tone sandhi
lexical tone acquisition

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.