We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. Learn more about our Privacy Notice... [opens in a new tab]
This community is part of Research Directions - a journal collection based around cutting edge research questions.

Exploring Multi-Materiality: challenges and potential pathways for scaling up 3D printing of biomaterials

27 May 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.
This item is a response to a research question in Biotechnology Design
Q. Bio-futures for transplanetary habitats

Abstract

Large-scale additive manufacturing is transforming architecture, design, and construction. However, the development of sustainable biomaterials for 3D printing remains in its early stages. Yet, due to its versatility, additive manufacturing promises to address challenges of resource scarcity and ecological disruption and calls for a paradigm shift in material use in architecture. While industrial materials like plastics, metals, concrete, and clay have reached market maturity, biodegradable alternatives such as plant fiber composites, starch-based bioplastics, and sawdust pastes remain largely experimental. These sustainable materials struggle with limited performance, scalability, and durability, restricting their application in large-scale 3D printing. Additionally, unlike conventional materials with established knowledge bases, biomaterials require new research frameworks, further delaying their adoption. This paper explores multi-material strategies as a solution to these challenges, leveraging complementary material properties to enhance performance and sustainability. Biocomposite thermoplastics for example provide immediate structural integrity, while upcycled biodegradable materials offer carbon storage and environmental benefits. Two approaches are introduced: the "intertwined" method, where fragile biodegradable materials adhere to robust biocomposites, and the "interwoven" method, where materials are layered to combine strengths. These strategies demonstrate potential solutions to the structural and processing limitations of biomaterials. Scaling up biomaterial-based 3D printing requires advancements in fabrication technology, regulatory support, and a shift in architectural thinking. Multi-material approaches present a viable pathway to overcoming current limitations, fostering innovation, and expanding the role of sustainable materials in additive manufacturing. By embracing these strategies, architecture and construction can move toward more scalable, durable, and environmentally conscious 3D printing applications.

Keywords

3D printing
multi-materiality
robotic fabrication
biomaterials

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.