We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. Learn more about our Privacy Notice... [opens in a new tab]

An Exact CMB Photon Radiation Density of the Universe Derived from Rh = ct Cosmology

24 March 2025, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

We will demonstrate that the photon energy density parameter Ωγ of the universe can be derived exactly inside RHt = ct cosmology. We find that it must be exactly: Ωγ = 1/ 5760π ≈5.526 × 10−5, which lies well within the 95% confidence interval for the photon radiation density reported by the Particle Data Group (PDG). Our exact result indicates that there is nouncertaintyintheradiationdensitywithinatleastsomesubclassesofRHt =ctcosmology and that such a model fits observations. Furthermore, in the standard model, the number density of CMB photons cannot be predicted from the Hubble parameter but only from the CMB temperature. For the first time, we derive a new equation for the number density of CMB photons that can predict the number density from only the Hubble parameter and the Planck length. This leads to a predicted number density of CMB photons equal to nγ = 410.71 ± 0.26 photons per cm^3, which is incredibly close to that reported by PDG when we use the H0 value recently described by Haug and Tatum, H0 = 66.8943 ± 0.0287 km/s/M pc. However, when using the H0 = 73.30 ± 1.04 km/s/Mpc value predicted by Riess et al., the photon number density prediction is far outside even the five-sigma confidence interval given by PDG. As we briefly discuss, this is related to why there is a Hubble tension in the Λ-CDM model.

Keywords

Photon energy density parameter
critical density
CMB radiation density

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.