Abstract
Biobased design and biotechnology have seen significant growth, intertwining biology, design, and technology to develop materials and products using biobased organisms like algae, bacteria, fungi, and organic byproducts. However, the lack of established frameworks for interdisciplinary research, particularly in creative fields like design, hinders progress in biodesign. This study explores adapting Structured Literature Reviews (SLRs) in biodesign to improve interdisciplinary knowledge synthesis, particularly for developing biobased materials. SLRs are effective tools for systematically gathering and analyzing information to understand complex topics and trends. Despite their expansion into various fields, conducting SLRs in interdisciplinary areas like biodesign remains challenging due to differing terminologies and research practices. In order to support comprehensive research in the biodesign field, this study maps alternative sources, concepts, and strategies relevant to the field and proposes guidelines for conducting SLRs in biodesign research. The study does this by interviewing 14 experienced biodesign practitioners and researchers from various backgrounds, including design, architecture, engineering, biology, and chemistry, and discussing these different topics based on a proposed list of elements. The study builds upon the ROSES reporting guidelines, known for their adaptability to different fields, to provide detailed and transparent reporting standards. The findings highlight key differences in how disciplines approach information sources, terminology, and methodologies in biodesign research. Recognizing these distinctions is crucial for comprehensive understanding and effective cross-disciplinary collaboration. By promoting inclusive knowledge integration, this study aims to support transdisciplinary partnerships and facilitate the integration of creative disciplines’ contributions to the biodesign field.