Goal-oriented plasticity of cortical speech tracking

01 December 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Background: Cortical tracking of speech (CTS) is thought to be automatic, extended across the hierarchy of linguistic features, and serve as the key neural mechanism for speech analysis. CTS is modulated by both exogenous (noise) and endogenous (age, proficiency) factors, showing functional plasticity under varied cognitive profiles and demands. Here, we asked whether CTS also displays task-specific plasticity adapting to listening goals. We recorded 64-channel EEG from 30 participants (MeanAge = 22.7; 15 females) listening to stories in three conditions: a) No Goal, b) focused on narrator accents (Auditory Goal), or c) story content (Semantic Goal). We hypothesised that CTS of goal-compatible features would be selectively enhanced: acoustic (Envelope) and semantic (Surprisal) tracking would increase for Auditory Goal and Semantic Goal conditions, respectively. Methods: EEG signals were 0.5-15Hz bandpass-filtered, ICA-ed for artefact removal, downsampled to 128Hz. CTS was measured via multivariate temporal response function modelling, predicting EEG from Envelope and Surprisal. Model prediction accuracy (r-values) estimated CTS fidelity across data-driven ROIs (significantly-decoding sensors across conditions). Results: Consistent with predictions, Surprisal CTS was reduced marginally for Auditory Goal compared to No Goal (p = .056), particularly in the temporo-parietal region (p = .013). However, Envelope CTS was also reduced for Auditory Goal compared to No Goal (p = .026) condition. No CTS changes were observed for Semantic Goal condition. Discussion: These results suggest that cortical tracking of both acoustic and semantic features shows goal-oriented flexibility only when attention is diverted away from the “default” content monitoring listening state.

Keywords

EEG
natural speech
decoding
goals
attention

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Ilnaz Gainutdinov: Dec 07, 2025, 16:18

Clean and well-designed poster with a clear take-home message: cortical tracking of both acoustic and semantic speech features is flexibly modulated by top-down goals, and diverting attention away from meaning (towards accent) suppresses tracking across the board.