Theta–Minima Coupling Hypothesis: Lattice-Theta Invariant from Experimental Solid-Electrolyte Crystallography

09 January 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This manuscript proposes a new-looking multiplicative lower-bound principle linking the Gaussian theta series of a Euclidean lattice to its successive minima, and introduces a computable coupling invariant branded as the Sakib Index SI. The central object is the Theta–Minima Coupling Hypothesis, which asserts that for any lattice Λ ⊂ Rn and any t > 0, the theta mass ΘΛ(t) is bounded below by a product of one-dimensional theta factors evaluated at the successive minima. While a full proof is open, we support the hypothesis using real-world, open experimental crystallography data: the OBELiX dataset of ∼600 synthesized lithium solid-state electrolyte materials with experimentally measured ionic conductivity and unit-cell parameters [1, 2]. From 562 entries with complete unit-cell parameters and con- ductivity, we compute SI after volume-normalization to determinant 1 (a purely mathematical transformation of experimental lattice parameters), and find: (i) SI is numerically near 0 for orthogonal (right-angled) cells and positive for strongly non-orthogonal cells (notably γ ≈ 120◦ NASICON-type entries), (ii) SI correlates strongly with an orthogonality-defect proxy (ρ ≈ 0.88), and (iii) within the NASI- CON family (n = 133), SI shows a moderate positive correlation with log10 ionic conductivity (ρ ≈ 0.41). We present ten data-based figures and six conceptual diagrams, and outline testable physical interpretations of SI as a geometry-coupling descriptor for transport and stability.

Keywords

geometric number theory
OBELiX
Sakib Index
lattice invariants
crystallography
solid electrolytes

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.