Abstract
This paper develops a theoretical and empirical framework to measure Risk Percep- tion Lag (RPL), the temporal distance between the objective realization of an eco- nomic shock and its subsequent incorporation into internal bank risk measurement and provisioning systems. Utilizing a comprehensive global panel of 320 commer- cial banks from 2011 to 2024, I decompose RPL into three structural dimensions: informational frictions, model inertia, and institutional delay. Methodologically, the study employs a two-step System GMM estimator to address the dynamic persistence and endogeneity inherent in risk recognition, alongside a Difference- in-Differences (DiD) design centered on the mandatory adoption of IFRS 9 and CECL. The results indicate that while the transition to forward-looking accounting has reduced average lag, structural inefficiencies, particularly rigid model recali- bration cycles and governance complexity, continue to drive significant temporal gaps. Furthermore, I find evidence of an asymmetric ”stigma effect” and for- bearance incentives: banks are quick to recognize severe credit deteriorations to signal ”kitchen-sinking” but delay the recognition of marginal deteriorations to prevent capital depletion. These findings provide critical insights for macropruden- tial surveillance, the calibration of countercyclical capital buffers, and the ongoing refinement of Basel IV and IFRS 9 frameworks.



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)