Temporal Inefficiencies in Risk Recognition: A Causal Analysis of Risk Perception Lag in Global Banking Systems

30 April 2026, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical and empirical framework to measure Risk Percep- tion Lag (RPL), the temporal distance between the objective realization of an eco- nomic shock and its subsequent incorporation into internal bank risk measurement and provisioning systems. Utilizing a comprehensive global panel of 320 commer- cial banks from 2011 to 2024, I decompose RPL into three structural dimensions: informational frictions, model inertia, and institutional delay. Methodologically, the study employs a two-step System GMM estimator to address the dynamic persistence and endogeneity inherent in risk recognition, alongside a Difference- in-Differences (DiD) design centered on the mandatory adoption of IFRS 9 and CECL. The results indicate that while the transition to forward-looking accounting has reduced average lag, structural inefficiencies, particularly rigid model recali- bration cycles and governance complexity, continue to drive significant temporal gaps. Furthermore, I find evidence of an asymmetric ”stigma effect” and for- bearance incentives: banks are quick to recognize severe credit deteriorations to signal ”kitchen-sinking” but delay the recognition of marginal deteriorations to prevent capital depletion. These findings provide critical insights for macropruden- tial surveillance, the calibration of countercyclical capital buffers, and the ongoing refinement of Basel IV and IFRS 9 frameworks.

Keywords

Risk perception lag
banking risk
panel data
System GMM
IFRS 9
Basel III
credit risk

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.