TAGC–LQG–RG: Consolidated Core Architecture, Liminal Transition, and Recalibrated Predictions (2026)

29 May 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper consolidates the TAGC–LQG–RG research programme following three decisions adopted in May 2026. First, the universal critical threshold κc = 2.04 ± 0.05 is established as a fundamental structural constant (HC2), not derivable from deeper dynamics. Second, κc is reinterpreted as a universal informational admissibility condition for stable classical accessibility, reframing the programme around informational admissibility and emergent anchoring interpreted via GFT sectors. Third, an architectural audit identifies five structural tensions (T1–T5) in earlier formulations; these dissolve under a refined view of κc as a gradual critical onset, introducing a transitional liminal regime LT between the unitary substrate dynamics L1 and the coarse-grained anchored dynamics L2. The consolidated hard core (HC1–HC5) is restated. HC4 is interpreted as effective‑local in L2, effective non‑Markovian in LT, and strictly unitary in L1. The hierarchy Anchoring → Accessibility is established, with A[Ψ] treated as an emergent observable. The master equation adopts a smooth onset profile of width δreg replacing the Heaviside step in the critical regime. The canonical normalisation Amin = 8πγ√3 ℓ²P at jmin = 1/2 is adopted as the reference convention, implying recalibration of the black‑hole remnant mass Mrem ≈ 0.648 MP and the ER↔EPR throat threshold, while predictions independent of Amin remain unchanged. Seven open problems define the research agenda. The paper maps the programme’s relation to thirteen previous manuscripts and references the 2026 Canonical Glossary as the authoritative source for terminology, level structure and recalibration. This work establishes the consolidated framework for subsequent TAGC–LQG–RG research.

Keywords

TAGC–LQG–RG
informational admissibility condition
fundamental constant
transitional liminal regime
anchoring–accessibility hierarchy
effective-local GKSL
canonical Loop Quantum Gravity normalisation
sectoral recalibration
Lakatosian programme architecture
informational stability principle

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.