Abstract
This paper examines which economic sectors produce the highest return relative to cost, a central but still unresolved question in development economics and macroeconomic policy. To address this, it introduces the Sectoral Economic Efficiency Index (SEEI), a multidimensional measure that combines benefits such as GDP growth, job creation, labor productivity, exports, and innovation against costs including capital requirements, public support, environmental burden, duration, and infrastructure needs. Building on SEEI, the paper develops the Sectoral Efficiency Frontier Theory (SEFT), which argues that the most efficient investment priorities are not fixed across countries, but depend on development stage, institutional capacity, and inter-sectoral linkages. It also proposes the Dynamic Cost-Benefit Productivity Index (DCBPI) to capture risk-adjusted productivity across short-, medium-, and long-term horizons. The analysis uses a balanced panel of 127 countries from 1995 to 2023, drawing on data from the World Bank, IMF, OECD, ILO, UNIDO, and WIPO. Using Fixed Effects, Random Effects, System GMM, Difference-in-Differences, and Quantile Regression models, the paper finds strong support for SEFT. ICT and advanced business services show the highest efficiency in high-income economies, while advanced manufacturing and industrial upgrading are more efficient in upper-middle-income economies. Infrastructure investment is consistently strong in the short run across all stages, while R&D, green energy, and human capital formation dominate in the long run, with DCBPI values roughly 2.4 to 3.1 times higher than short-run alternatives. These findings suggest a phased sectoral strategy for growth and offer practical guidance for industrial policy under fiscal constraints.
Supplementary materials
Title
Sectoral Economic Efficiency and National Growth: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Structural Transformation Across Development Stages
Description
Comprehensively revised and strengthened the manuscript for publication-quality academic presentation while fully preserving the original theoretical framework, econometric structure, equations, statistical results, and empirical conclusions. Improved the abstract, introduction, literature review, methodological explanations, empirical discussion, policy analysis, and overall logical flow to align with the standards of leading economics working papers and international research institutions. Refined the presentation of SEEI, SEFT, and DCBPI to create a more coherent and analytically rigorous framework connected to structural transformation, productivity spillovers, and development-stage conditionality literature. Enhanced transitions, readability, econometric clarity, and academic tone while removing repetitive and mechanical phrasing. Added a professional Data Availability and Research Repository section covering dataset transparency, replication guidance, methodological reproducibility, variable construction, and recommended archival platforms including Harvard Dataverse, Zenodo, OSF, and GitHub. Also developed a structured companion panel dataset and replication-ready Excel workbook calibrated to reproduce the paper’s reported empirical results.
Actions



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)