Auditable Halt Rules and Point-in-Time Data Governance in Low-Signal Equity Research:An A-Share Strategy–Forecast Competition Framework with a Single-Stock Proof of Concept

07 August 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Single-stock studies collapse data availability, strategy rules, execution, forecasting, and investment conclusions into one analytical layer, allowing non-executable strategies to be proxied, in-sample rankings to be treated as deployable, and forecasting failure to be obscured by precise-looking price paths. This paper proposes an auditable framework based on point-in-time data governance, a strategy eligibility registry, out-of-sample competition, statistical and economic thresholds, and halt codes. The infrastructure includes 19 data tables, 13 source classes, and 15 quality gates. VALIDATION-HALT constrains strategy claims, while FORECAST-HALT constrains forecasting claims. A proof of concept uses 6,809 trading days for Yingluohua (000795.SZ) from August 8, 1997, to August 4, 2026. Of 155 candidate strategies, only nine qualified for backtesting. RSI(14) oversold mean reversion achieved an 11.05% compound annual growth rate and a 0.729 Sharpe ratio in the out-of-sample period, but generated only 20 position changes and lacked parameter stability. The 50/200-day moving-average crossover delivered a similar return with a −55.13% maximum drawdown. The inverse-error-weighted forecasting ensemble recorded a 2.604% return RMSE, an out-of-sample R² of 0.328% against a random-walk benchmark, and a Diebold–Mariano p-value of 0.515. Neither result satisfied the preregistered validation rules. The confirmatory design requires at least 2,000 point-in-time A-share stocks, 5 million stock-day observations, 1.5 million out-of-sample forecasts, 60,000 firm-quarter observations, and 200 out-of-sample trades per core strategy, with multiple-testing control, risk-factor adjustment, regime stratification, frozen prospective validation, and license-controlled reproducibility. The framework converts non-comparability, insufficient evidence, and failure to outperform into traceable decision states.

Keywords

point-in-time data
halt rules
out-of-sample testing
technical trading rules
model risk
data licensing
reproducible financial research

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.