Abstract
A survivable sea-based deterrent is not fully described by force totals or by an aggregate probability that some retaliatory capacity remains. If the governing operating rule is that no accountable ballistic-missile submarine may cross a declared compromise threshold, the force must be scored by its worst-positioned hull. This article formalizes that rule with the min-hull safety function h_min = min_i(c_i − σ_i), defines the corresponding admissible set, and studies a dual-regime controller that combines continuous quieting with additional recovery authority when a conservative look-ahead predicts boundary contact. The model is intentionally stylized; it does not represent a real patrol, sensor system, or adversary. Its narrower purpose is to show that aggregate survivability and patrol integrity are different mathematical problems. In a reproducible two-hull illustration, quieting alone leaves the min-hull admissible set, while a look-ahead dual controller preserves positive margin under the baseline disturbance. The certificate is finite: as disturbance intensity increases, the same controller eventually fails. The policy implication is disciplined certification, not invulnerability: define the safe set, declare the disturbance family, bound uncertainty, and verify that recovery authority directs the force back inward.



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)