Abstract
Relational social theory often struggles to distinguish general social reproduction from specifically political transformation. This article resolves that ambiguity by proposing a three-operation structural framework: relational transformation, wherein an entity’s political significance changes through repositioning without intrinsic material alteration; relational inheritance, wherein historical configurations stabilize across time through institutional channels; and relational openness, wherein plural actors initiate unpredicted action upon inherited conditions. Rather than treating institutions as static constraints or human agency as unconditioned, the article argues that political order represents relational history preserved in institutions, while politics proper survives where plural action retains the prospective capacity to reconfigure that history. The framework is tested against classical theoretical touchstones and formalized through explicit scale, coercion, and boundary conditions designed to prevent reductionist collapse into behaviorism or pure structural determinism.



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)