Gen Z’s scholarly attitudes, behaviour and AI: what’s new and spot the difference? An international comparison

14 September 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Our latest series of 'Harbingers' interviews were conducted in March 2026; six months after data collection, too soon for full in-depth analysis, but soon enough for some initial impressions to be overtaken. This is an update to first impressions; have we, in the face of visible advances in the adoption of AI, reason to think again. So, too, with our recalibration to see Early Career Researchers as 'Gen-Z' rather than 'Millennials'. These are the opinions of those who conducted the long, conversational interviews, first hand impressions now in retrospect but before memory is overlaid. First impressions also from data analysis that is still a work-in-progress. Partial, incomplete, subject to sampling bias, this is how in looks in September 2026 but provides a useful heads-up. More details about the project can be found in Nicholas et al. (2026a,b)

Keywords

Gen Z ECRs
national differences
AI

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.