DEVELOPING AN AREA-BASED EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR STRENGTHENING INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP IN PATTANI EDUCATION SANDBOX SCHOOLS, THAILAND

19 September 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Educational reform in culturally distinctive settings requires management approaches that are responsive to local needs, institutional capacities, and community expectations. Pattani Province, located in Thailand’s southern border region, presents a multicultural educational environment in which schools differ in governance, organizational structure, resources, language, religious identity, and relationships with supervisory agencies. Thailand’s Education Sandbox policy provides participating schools with greater flexibility to develop locally appropriate educational innovations. However, policy flexibility alone is insufficient to improve teaching and learning. Schools still require leaders who can coordinate stakeholders, establish clear educational priorities, support teachers, use evidence for decision-making, and maintain accountability. These requirements are especially important in private Islamic schools, where the roles of licence holders, managers, foundation committees, and school directors may overlap and where access to educational supervision and quality-assurance expertise is often uneven. This study aimed to develop an Area-Based Educational Management (ABEM) Model to strengthen instructional leadership in Pattani Education Sandbox schools. Its specific objectives were to examine existing educational management conditions, identify management and leadership capacities needed by school administrators, develop a context-responsive educational management innovation, and formulate practical and policy recommendations for sustainable school improvement. The study was guided by the view that instructional leadership should not be treated as an isolated set of principal behaviours. Rather, it should be supported by collaborative governance, organisational learning, professional participation, and systematic quality assurance. This view is consistent with evidence that instructional and distributed leadership influence classroom practice through teacher collaboration, professional capacity, and organisational conditions.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.