Six trains on three axes: a Lorentz-covariant analysis of a multi-frame light-signal thought experiment

29 September 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

I analyse a thought experiment in which six trains move at 0.99c along three mutually perpendicular embankments. Lightning strikes, fixed mirrors and train-mounted mirrors generate light signals between the trains and the embankments. I define every event in the embankment frame and transform each event into the train frames with Lorentz transformations. I then compare special relativity (SR) with a Galilean emission rule in which reflected light inherits the velocity of the mirror. Four results follow. First, the nine bodies form seven inertial frames, not nine, and give 21 unordered pairs with only three distinct relative speeds. Second, separation speeds in the embankment frame reach 1.98c for collinear trains and 1.40c for perpendicular trains, while every relative velocity stays below c (0.99995c and 0.99980c). Third, every light path between embankment mirrors takes the same time in both models, so these paths cannot test SR. Only light clocks carried by the trains discriminate: for a clock of height one light-second, SR predicts a round trip of 14.18 s of embankment time and the emission rule predicts 2.00 s. Existing tests of source-velocity independence and of time dilation already decide this case in favour of SR. Fourth, a perpendicular pair of trains exposes a Wigner rotation of 73.9°, which resolves the apparent conflict between the "length" of one train and the "width" of another. The geometry gives a complete, checkable event bookkeeping for teaching and for testing claims about relativistic kinematics.

Keywords

special relativity
relativity of simultaneity
relative velocity
separation speed
Wigner rotation
emission theory
thought experiment

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.