We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. Learn more about our Privacy Notice... [opens in a new tab]
This community is part of Research Directions - a journal collection based around cutting edge research questions.

Economics of One Health, "Synergizing economic forces: Strategies for sustainable development” Kenyan case study

31 January 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.
This item is a response to a research question in One Health
Q. One Health most often has people as the primary beneficiary. How must One Health policies and practice change to make animal, plant and ecosystem health a primary focus that is influenced by human and environmental factors?

Abstract

Kenya grapples with the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, making the One Health approach crucial. This Kenya Red Cross (KRCS) case study, supported by IFRC and USAID, explores the economic benefits of adopting this holistic health strategy. Government and development partners prioritize capacity building, surveillance, and community engagement. KRCS, a key One Health stakeholder, has trained 261 community health assistants , 126 animal health assistants, 2,326 community health promoters, 16 journalists, and 10,800 students and teachers in Epidemic Preparedness and Response in Communities (EPiC) and community-based surveillance. These trainings that adopts a One Health approach has facilitated early detection and action against health threats, preserving lives and livelihoods. The trained health promoters and sensitized communities ensure timely reporting and coordinated responses to zoonotic disease outbreaks. In the year 2023, community health promoters reported 18 animal anthrax alerts, 13 of which were confirmed cases. This triggered the government to conduct a targeted anthrax ring vaccination campaign, reaching 28,221 cattle. With anthrax vaccines costing USD 3 per dose and each cattle valued at USD 450, the intervention cost approximately USD 8,652, safeguarding a herd worth an estimated USD 12,699,450. These efforts highlight the economic and health advantages of the One Health approach in addressing zoonotic diseases and enhancing community resilience.

Keywords

One Health Approach
Community Resilience
Preparedness
Stakeholders
Coordination
Community engagement
Surveillance
zoonotic diseases
Capacity building

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.