We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. Learn more about our Privacy Notice... [opens in a new tab]

When Periodicity Fails to Guarantee the Existence of Rotation

14 April 2025, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

In this manuscript, we present a simple counterexample of a smooth $C^{\infty}$ periodic system modulo $\mathbb{Z}^3$, where the rotation vector exists only in the weak sense and not in the strong sense (also referred to as frequencies in physics and biology). This example highlights the subtle yet important distinction between these two concepts of rotation vectors in the context of periodic flows. It also raises open questions regarding the role of arithmetic properties, such as Liouville numbers, in the dynamics of such systems, pointing to areas for future research in the theory of oscillating systems.

Keywords

Periodic system
differential equation
rotation vector

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.